About the ABF
Events States & Clubs System Cards Members Youth Bridge Newsletter Directors Links Site Map
|
|
What should I Bid? - Best enquiry for December 2007 Maura Rhodes made the best submission for the month of December. Hand: Nil vulnerable, North is dealer. I was South:
Comments: My 2 was supposed to be a negative, not a relay and as such was, I think, inaccurate. Where did I go wrong? Was it in the 2 response or in not taking any strong action after 3? Clearly 3NT was to be passed which it was. 12 tricks rolled home effortlessly. 7 was on but not really biddable, in my opinion, but I do think 6NT was. Your thoughts, please, Sartaj? Sartaj's Reply: Hi Maura, The problem in your methods seems to be that the 3NT rebid was way too wide-ranging. From your partner's point of view, you could have held a hand as weak as xxxx or a medium hand like Kxxx or even a hand as strong as the one you did hold. Your actual hand did have a lot of potential opposite a 2 opening but was somehow unable to express it. However, in order to consider the right bid, we need to go a step back... There is one convention that is almost universal in the so-called expert community, that is the "double negative" over a Game-Force opening. Over 2, one could play the 2 response as 5+ HCP and 2 as 0-4 HCP and others as per normal agreement. This arrangement removes the fear of responding being totally bust and encourages the 2 opener to bid out his shape. I don't have a convincing solution to your problem (2 auctions are hard in general), Possibilities include.... 2
2
(5+) ? Or 2
2(?) ? In the latter auction, some theoretically minded individuals play 4NT as quantitative but in my partnership with Tony we play it as RKCB. A practical approach to 2 response structure is popular in Canberra. In principle it goes something like : 2
= 0-4 or 9+ and so on... Lots of options, not a lot of confidence :) Regards
|