About the ABF
![]() Events ![]() States & Clubs ![]() System Cards ![]() Members ![]() Youth Bridge ![]() Newsletter ![]() Directors ![]() Links ![]() Site Map ![]()
|
What should I Bid? - Best enquiry for July 2005 The best submission for the month of July was made by Maura Rhodes. Hand: The dealer is West and as East you hold.
* Weak, 12-14 Comments: We play Acol
with transfers. After the intervention I don't know how to find out if
partner likes diamonds which is crucial. I chose to bid 2NT-Lebensohl and,
after 3 Partner held:
5 And Peter’s Response: Hi Maura, Special bidding conventions such as Lebensohl are only useful if the partnership understands the convention itself and the implications of choosing not to use the convention in situations where it might have been employed. Thus in the current situation, playing Lebensohl, there are three ways to introduce a suit below 3NT. These are -
Understanding this allows a partnership to assign three different strengths to the three different actions. The bid at the two level is logically natural, nonforcing, with no invitational connotations. The other two options are available for invitational hands and game forcing hands with the partnership deciding which approach is more appropriate to their needs. In the case of suits at, or below, the level of the intervention, only two obvious methods are available, since the bid at the two level is not available. In the given example you could agree to play 2 On this deal, in this context, the auction ought to be:
It is a must to accept partner's invitation with that diamond holding despite the minimum in high cards. Whether the auction stops there or ends up elsewhere may depend on table factors. You claim that both 3NT and 5 Regards |