About the ABF
![]() Events ![]() States & Clubs ![]() System Cards ![]() Members ![]() Youth Bridge ![]() Newsletter ![]() Directors ![]() Links ![]() Site Map ![]()
|
|
What should I bid? - Best enquiry for May 2010 The best submission for May came from Brian Thorp. Hand: Dealer East with EW vulnerable, I was West with this hand:
Comments: We play 5-card majors with a weak NT. East held AKQ93, Q5, KQ8, AT9. I responded 1NT because I thought 1NT would be less attractive to partner and I
had ten losers if we played in a spade contract. Would you have bid 1NT with my
hand? If not, are there any hands with 6-9 hcp and 3-card support for partner's
5-card major where you would do? If I had responded 2 On the actual deal, 4 Kieran's Reply: Brian,
The 1NT response with three card support is OK with truly vile raises - those
not really good enough for a raise to 2 This hand has three positives for 1NT - mediocre six-count, 3433 shape and weak
spades. Against bidding 1NT is the concentration of honours, which increases
the chance that you belong in a suit. All things considered, I don't regard
either 2 (Strong notrumpers can also bid 1NT fairly safely with 10-11 balanced with three trumps - your partner either has a weak notrump or will rebid. Weak notrumpers can only do this if partner can be relied upon to systemically rebid (in a 3-card minor, say) with his balanced 15-16s. It's playable, but it's not common.) Over 2 3NT looks superior, regardless of siding - it's hard work for the opponents to
untangle four heart tricks, so 3NT should make any time that the spades run and
some other times besides. 4 Kieran |