What should I Bid? - Best enquiry for November 2006
Gordon Hansen made the best submission for the
month of November.
Hand: My partner
and I, vulnerable, were dealt the following:
J98
K974
QJ652
6 |
|
KQ6
63
A9874
A98 |
Bidding:
|
West
|
North
|
East |
South |
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
Pass
|
1 |
Pass |
Pass
|
|
Double
|
2 |
2 |
Pass
|
|
Pass
|
2 |
Double |
3
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
|
Comments: Playing basic
standard with five card majors. We play balancing doubles so I knew what
partner was doing. Should I bid first time around? Should partner bid
3
?
Peter's Reply:
Hi Gordon,
Unless your defensive bidding method is to double
an opponent's opening one bid simply to show an opening hand, I wouldn't
bid immediately over the 1
opening. This method, adopted by some, I find inferior.
To bid an immediate 2 here is very poor. Overcalling at the two level
with an empty five-card suit is looking for trouble; doing it with values
in the opponent's suit compounds the risk.
I expect partner did not bid 3 because he/she
saw your penalty double of 2 and decided not to get in your way in
case you wanted to double 3
too.
Nonetheless, I think partner was a little
optimistic and 3 might have been a better choice. 3 will
not necessarily make, given that North could easily be 6-5 here and 3
fail on a defensive crossruff.
Why is the double of 2 a penalty double? Because logically you must
have quite a good hand to be bidding again here, and, given your initial
silence, that implies some length in the opener's suit i.e. you had the
strength to double initially, but had too much in their opened suit.
I would have passed rather than doubling 2 as I have no surprises for
declarer. North could see their hand while bidding and had heard everyone
else's effort to that point, including their partners thrice silence.
Something like:
AJ109xx
A
x
KQ10xx
wouldn't surprise, with 5 cold and 2 doubled making unless you
find the highly unlikely lead of the A to give partner two club ruffs.
Regards Peter Fordham
What
to Bid | Home
|