1 DAVID HOFFMAN & RON KLINGER

Round 5

vs 3 ROGER JANUSZKE & JOHN ZOLLO

NS 2		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-1010	-5	810	990		6 EW	600	8	-240	-260		11 EW	50	0	-40	40
2 EW	490	7	-210	50		7 EW	110	-2	-160	180		12 EW	140	4	0	-60
3 EW	-420	-8	60	30		8 EW	-450	-1	430	440		13 EW	1430	11	-870	-630
4 EW	110	-8	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	50	-4	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	0	610	490		10 EW	-200	9	590	540
Net Imps 11

______________________________________________________________________

2 DAVID LILLEY & ZOLLY NAGY

Round 5

vs 9 MARTIN BLOOM & EDWARD CHADWICK

NS 3		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	1020	5	810	990		6 NS	200	10	-240	-260		11 NS	-50	0	-40	40
2 NS	50	6	-210	50		7 NS	-110	2	-160	180		12 NS	100	3	0	-60
3 NS	140	2	60	30		8 NS	450	1	430	440		13 NS	-1430	-11	-870	-630
4 NS	-600	-5	-430	-500		9 NS	450	-1	470	610		14 NS	-600	-9	-210	-50
5 NS	600	0	610	490		10 NS	680	3	590	540
Net Imps 6

______________________________________________________________________

3 ROGER JANUSZKE & JOHN ZOLLO

Round 5

vs 1 DAVID HOFFMAN & RON KLINGER

NS 2		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	1010	5	810	990		6 NS	-600	-8	-240	-260		11 NS	-50	0	-40	40
2 NS	-490	-7	-210	50		7 NS	-110	2	-160	180		12 NS	-140	-4	0	-60
3 NS	420	8	60	30		8 NS	450	1	430	440		13 NS	-1430	-11	-870	-630
4 NS	-110	8	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-50	4	-210	-50
5 NS	600	0	610	490		10 NS	200	-9	590	540
Net Imps -11

______________________________________________________________________

4 MIKE & VIVIEN CORNELL

Round 5

vs 19 JESSE CHAN & GEORGE FINIKIOTIS

NS 1		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-480	8	810	990		6 EW	-200	-10	-240	-260		11 EW	-100	-4	-40	40
2 EW	430	6	-210	50		7 EW	110	-2	-160	180		12 EW	140	4	0	-60
3 EW	-110	-2	60	30		8 EW	-450	-1	430	440		13 EW	1430	11	-870	-630
4 EW	630	5	-430	-500		9 EW	-450	1	470	610		14 EW	400	5	-210	-50
5 EW	-660	-2	610	490		10 EW	-100	10	590	540
Net Imps 29

______________________________________________________________________

5 PETER CHAN & DAVID LUSK

Round 5

vs 15 JEANNETTE COLLINS & STAN KLOFA

NS 6		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-980	-5	810	990		6 EW	620	9	-240	-260		11 EW	-90	-4	-40	40
2 EW	400	5	-210	50		7 EW	-100	-6	-160	180		12 EW	-100	-3	0	-60
3 EW	100	4	60	30		8 EW	-420	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	630	5	-430	-500		9 EW	-450	1	470	610		14 EW	-200	-9	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	0	610	490		10 EW	-650	-2	590	540
Net Imps -10

______________________________________________________________________

6 MARGARET BOURKE & ERIC RAMSHAW

Round 5

vs 11 JOHN ASHWORTH & JOHN BROCKWELL

NS 12		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-1510	-12	810	990		6 EW	620	9	-240	-260		11 EW	-50	-3	-40	40
2 EW	400	5	-210	50		7 EW	110	-2	-160	180		12 EW	140	4	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-2	60	30		8 EW	-420	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	140	-7	-430	-500		9 EW	-450	1	470	610		14 EW	-50	-6	-210	-50
5 EW	-690	-2	610	490		10 EW	-620	-1	590	540
Net Imps -21

______________________________________________________________________

7 JANE DAWSON & BOB RICHMAN

Round 5

vs 23 GORDON FALLON & ARIE MEYDAN

NS 14		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	510	-7	810	990		6 NS	300	11	-240	-260		11 NS	500	11	-40	40
2 NS	50	6	-210	50		7 NS	1100	15	-160	180		12 NS	-800	-13	0	-60
3 NS	-100	-4	60	30		8 NS	450	1	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-130	7	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-100	3	-210	-50
5 NS	-100	-12	610	490		10 NS	650	2	590	540
Net Imps 25

______________________________________________________________________

8 DAVID CHERRY & DAVID MIDDLETON

Round 5

vs 31 RUTH CHAPMAN & ROSEMARY CORNISH

NS 5		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-990	-5	810	990		6 EW	650	9	-240	-260		11 EW	200	4	-40	40
2 EW	-50	-6	-210	50		7 EW	500	8	-160	180		12 EW	-50	-2	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-2	60	30		8 EW	-420	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	630	5	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	400	5	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	0	610	490		10 EW	-620	-1	590	540
Net Imps 10

______________________________________________________________________

9 MARTIN BLOOM & EDWARD CHADWICK

Round 5

vs 2 DAVID LILLEY & ZOLLY NAGY

NS 3		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-1020	-5	810	990		6 EW	-200	-10	-240	-260		11 EW	50	0	-40	40
2 EW	-50	-6	-210	50		7 EW	110	-2	-160	180		12 EW	-100	-3	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-2	60	30		8 EW	-450	-1	430	440		13 EW	1430	11	-870	-630
4 EW	600	5	-430	-500		9 EW	-450	1	470	610		14 EW	600	9	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	0	610	490		10 EW	-680	-3	590	540
Net Imps -6

______________________________________________________________________

10 ROBERT GALLUS & DENISE MCKINNON

Round 5

vs 17 KERRIN DAWS & CHARLIE SCHWABEGGER

NS 7		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-980	-5	810	990		6 EW	650	9	-240	-260		11 EW	50	0	-40	40
2 EW	-50	-6	-210	50		7 EW	1400	15	-160	180		12 EW	500	11	0	-60
3 EW	300	8	60	30		8 EW	-420	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	140	-7	-430	-500		9 EW	-980	-11	470	610		14 EW	400	5	-210	-50
5 EW	-660	-2	610	490		10 EW	-790	-5	590	540
Net Imps 7

______________________________________________________________________

11 JOHN ASHWORTH & JOHN BROCKWELL

Round 5

vs 6 MARGARET BOURKE & ERIC RAMSHAW

NS 12		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	1510	12	810	990		6 NS	-620	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	50	3	-40	40
2 NS	-400	-5	-210	50		7 NS	-110	2	-160	180		12 NS	-140	-4	0	-60
3 NS	140	2	60	30		8 NS	420	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-140	7	-430	-500		9 NS	450	-1	470	610		14 NS	50	6	-210	-50
5 NS	690	2	610	490		10 NS	620	1	590	540
Net Imps 21

______________________________________________________________________

12 PENTTI RASILAINEN & MACIEK ZURAWEL

Round 5

vs 29 HELEN LUXTON & WENDY WEBSTER

NS 8		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	980	5	810	990		6 NS	200	10	-240	-260		11 NS	-300	-6	-40	40
2 NS	-430	-6	-210	50		7 NS	-110	2	-160	180		12 NS	-110	-3	0	-60
3 NS	-50	-3	60	30		8 NS	450	1	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-5	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-400	-5	-210	-50
5 NS	-100	-12	610	490		10 NS	650	2	590	540
Net Imps -15

______________________________________________________________________

13 DAVID MCLEISH & DAVID SMYTH

Round 5

vs 35 DARRYL COUZNER & BILL LOCKWOOD

NS 17		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-1010	-5	810	990		6 EW	650	9	-240	-260		11 EW	50	0	-40	40
2 EW	140	-2	-210	50		7 EW	-100	-6	-160	180		12 EW	-50	-2	0	-60
3 EW	-170	-3	60	30		8 EW	-430	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	630	5	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	-200	-9	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	0	610	490		10 EW	-200	9	590	540
Net Imps -9

______________________________________________________________________

14 TERRY BROWN & SUSAN INGHAM

Round 5

vs 26 RICHARD & SUE GRENSIDE

NS 4		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	510	-7	810	990		6 NS	100	8	-240	-260		11 NS	50	3	-40	40
2 NS	50	6	-210	50		7 NS	-110	2	-160	180		12 NS	50	2	0	-60
3 NS	110	2	60	30		8 NS	430	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-110	8	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-50	4	-210	-50
5 NS	600	0	610	490		10 NS	650	2	590	540
Net Imps 35

______________________________________________________________________

15 JEANNETTE COLLINS & STAN KLOFA

Round 5

vs 5 PETER CHAN & DAVID LUSK

NS 6		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	980	5	810	990		6 NS	-620	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	90	4	-40	40
2 NS	-400	-5	-210	50		7 NS	100	6	-160	180		12 NS	100	3	0	-60
3 NS	-100	-4	60	30		8 NS	420	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-5	-430	-500		9 NS	450	-1	470	610		14 NS	200	9	-210	-50
5 NS	600	0	610	490		10 NS	650	2	590	540
Net Imps 10

______________________________________________________________________

16 PHIL BECK & DAVID CHUNG

Round 5

vs 18 JOHN MOTTRAM & ELIZABETH QUITTNER

NS 9		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	520	-7	810	990		6 NS	100	8	-240	-260		11 NS	-50	0	-40	40
2 NS	-430	-6	-210	50		7 NS	-110	2	-160	180		12 NS	100	3	0	-60
3 NS	-50	-3	60	30		8 NS	420	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-100	8	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-100	3	-210	-50
5 NS	600	0	610	490		10 NS	650	2	590	540
Net Imps 15

______________________________________________________________________

17 KERRIN DAWS & CHARLIE SCHWABEGGER

Round 5

vs 10 ROBERT GALLUS & DENISE MCKINNON

NS 7		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	980	5	810	990		6 NS	-650	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	-50	0	-40	40
2 NS	50	6	-210	50		7 NS	-1400	-15	-160	180		12 NS	-500	-11	0	-60
3 NS	-300	-8	60	30		8 NS	420	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-140	7	-430	-500		9 NS	980	11	470	610		14 NS	-400	-5	-210	-50
5 NS	660	2	610	490		10 NS	790	5	590	540
Net Imps -7

______________________________________________________________________

18 JOHN MOTTRAM & ELIZABETH QUITTNER

Round 5

vs 16 PHIL BECK & DAVID CHUNG

NS 9		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-520	7	810	990		6 EW	-100	-8	-240	-260		11 EW	50	0	-40	40
2 EW	430	6	-210	50		7 EW	110	-2	-160	180		12 EW	-100	-3	0	-60
3 EW	50	3	60	30		8 EW	-420	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	100	-8	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	100	-3	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	0	610	490		10 EW	-650	-2	590	540
Net Imps -15

______________________________________________________________________

19 JESSE CHAN & GEORGE FINIKIOTIS

Round 5

vs 4 MIKE & VIVIEN CORNELL

NS 1		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	480	-8	810	990		6 NS	200	10	-240	-260		11 NS	100	4	-40	40
2 NS	-430	-6	-210	50		7 NS	-110	2	-160	180		12 NS	-140	-4	0	-60
3 NS	110	2	60	30		8 NS	450	1	430	440		13 NS	-1430	-11	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-5	-430	-500		9 NS	450	-1	470	610		14 NS	-400	-5	-210	-50
5 NS	660	2	610	490		10 NS	100	-10	590	540
Net Imps -29

______________________________________________________________________

20 GAVIN & KIRSTEN BAILEY

Round 5

vs 21 JEAN EDDIE & FRANK KOVACS

NS 11		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	510	-7	810	990		6 NS	-620	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	-100	-2	-40	40
2 NS	-460	-6	-210	50		7 NS	-200	-1	-160	180		12 NS	50	2	0	-60
3 NS	170	3	60	30		8 NS	420	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-5	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-100	3	-210	-50
5 NS	690	2	610	490		10 NS	230	-8	590	540
Net Imps -23

______________________________________________________________________

21 JEAN EDDIE & FRANK KOVACS

Round 5

vs 20 GAVIN & KIRSTEN BAILEY

NS 11		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-510	7	810	990		6 EW	620	9	-240	-260		11 EW	100	2	-40	40
2 EW	460	6	-210	50		7 EW	200	1	-160	180		12 EW	-50	-2	0	-60
3 EW	-170	-3	60	30		8 EW	-420	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	630	5	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	100	-3	-210	-50
5 EW	-690	-2	610	490		10 EW	-230	8	590	540
Net Imps 23

______________________________________________________________________

22 DAVID GARLAND & JOHN ROPER

Round 5

vs 28 IAN HEAIRFIELD & JANICE HEPBURN

NS 10		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-520	7	810	990		6 EW	620	9	-240	-260		11 EW	100	2	-40	40
2 EW	120	-3	-210	50		7 EW	110	-2	-160	180		12 EW	-100	-3	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-2	60	30		8 EW	-420	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	630	5	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	-150	-8	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	0	610	490		10 EW	-650	-2	590	540
Net Imps -2

______________________________________________________________________

23 GORDON FALLON & ARIE MEYDAN

Round 5

vs 7 JANE DAWSON & BOB RICHMAN

NS 14		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-510	7	810	990		6 EW	-300	-11	-240	-260		11 EW	-500	-11	-40	40
2 EW	-50	-6	-210	50		7 EW	-1100	-15	-160	180		12 EW	800	13	0	-60
3 EW	100	4	60	30		8 EW	-450	-1	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	130	-7	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	100	-3	-210	-50
5 EW	100	12	610	490		10 EW	-650	-2	590	540
Net Imps -25

______________________________________________________________________

24 VALERIE HARDIE & BERNICE KENT

Round 5

vs 34 JANET MUNRO & EILEEN SEABORN

NS 18		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	1010	5	810	990		6 NS	-620	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	-100	-2	-40	40
2 NS	-430	-6	-210	50		7 NS	-100	2	-160	180		12 NS	90	3	0	-60
3 NS	140	2	60	30		8 NS	420	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-140	7	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-150	2	-210	-50
5 NS	-100	-12	610	490		10 NS	650	2	590	540
Net Imps -1

______________________________________________________________________

25 MARIE MCMAHON & PETER WILLIAMS

Round 5

vs 38 JUDITH MACKLOW & SUE WELBOURN

NS 19		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	-50	-13	810	990		6 NS	400	12	-240	-260		11 NS	550	11	-40	40
2 NS	-130	2	-210	50		7 NS	100	6	-160	180		12 NS	90	3	0	-60
3 NS	170	3	60	30		8 NS	400	-1	430	440		13 NS	-500	9	-870	-630
4 NS	-150	7	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	150	8	-210	-50
5 NS	750	4	610	490		10 NS	620	1	590	540
Net Imps 52

______________________________________________________________________

26 RICHARD & SUE GRENSIDE

Round 5

vs 14 TERRY BROWN & SUSAN INGHAM

NS 4		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-510	7	810	990		6 EW	-100	-8	-240	-260		11 EW	-50	-3	-40	40
2 EW	-50	-6	-210	50		7 EW	110	-2	-160	180		12 EW	-50	-2	0	-60
3 EW	-110	-2	60	30		8 EW	-430	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	110	-8	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	50	-4	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	0	610	490		10 EW	-650	-2	590	540
Net Imps -35

______________________________________________________________________

28 IAN HEAIRFIELD & JANICE HEPBURN

Round 5

vs 22 DAVID GARLAND & JOHN ROPER

NS 10		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	520	-7	810	990		6 NS	-620	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	-100	-2	-40	40
2 NS	-120	3	-210	50		7 NS	-110	2	-160	180		12 NS	100	3	0	-60
3 NS	140	2	60	30		8 NS	420	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-5	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	150	8	-210	-50
5 NS	600	0	610	490		10 NS	650	2	590	540
Net Imps 2

______________________________________________________________________

29 HELEN LUXTON & WENDY WEBSTER

Round 5

vs 12 PENTTI RASILAINEN & MACIEK ZURAWEL

NS 8		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-980	-5	810	990		6 EW	-200	-10	-240	-260		11 EW	300	6	-40	40
2 EW	430	6	-210	50		7 EW	110	-2	-160	180		12 EW	110	3	0	-60
3 EW	50	3	60	30		8 EW	-450	-1	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	630	5	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	400	5	-210	-50
5 EW	100	12	610	490		10 EW	-650	-2	590	540
Net Imps 15

______________________________________________________________________

30 HELGA CORBETT & JUNE RODEN

Round 5

vs 33 JOAN BARNETT & MARY JOHNSTON

NS 15		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	980	5	810	990		6 NS	100	8	-240	-260		11 NS	100	4	-40	40
2 NS	50	6	-210	50		7 NS	-90	2	-160	180		12 NS	-140	-4	0	-60
3 NS	140	2	60	30		8 NS	420	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-180	6	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-400	-5	-210	-50
5 NS	600	0	610	490		10 NS	620	1	590	540
Net Imps 30

______________________________________________________________________

31 RUTH CHAPMAN & ROSEMARY CORNISH

Round 5

vs 8 DAVID CHERRY & DAVID MIDDLETON

NS 5		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	990	5	810	990		6 NS	-650	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	-200	-4	-40	40
2 NS	50	6	-210	50		7 NS	-500	-8	-160	180		12 NS	50	2	0	-60
3 NS	140	2	60	30		8 NS	420	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-5	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-400	-5	-210	-50
5 NS	600	0	610	490		10 NS	620	1	590	540
Net Imps -10

______________________________________________________________________

32 VAL CHURCHILL & GENE EFINGER

Round 5

vs 62 COLIN NORTON & PHAIK YAO

NS 13		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-990	-5	810	990		6 EW	-300	-11	-240	-260		11 EW	-130	-5	-40	40
2 EW	90	-3	-210	50		7 EW	110	-2	-160	180		12 EW	-90	-3	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-2	60	30		8 EW	-450	-1	430	440		13 EW	650	-6	-870	-630
4 EW	110	-8	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	400	5	-210	-50
5 EW	-660	-2	610	490		10 EW	-650	-2	590	540
Net Imps -45

______________________________________________________________________

33 JOAN BARNETT & MARY JOHNSTON

Round 5

vs 30 HELGA CORBETT & JUNE RODEN

NS 15		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-980	-5	810	990		6 EW	-100	-8	-240	-260		11 EW	-100	-4	-40	40
2 EW	-50	-6	-210	50		7 EW	90	-2	-160	180		12 EW	140	4	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-2	60	30		8 EW	-420	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	180	-6	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	400	5	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	0	610	490		10 EW	-620	-1	590	540
Net Imps -30

______________________________________________________________________

34 JANET MUNRO & EILEEN SEABORN

Round 5

vs 24 VALERIE HARDIE & BERNICE KENT

NS 18		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-1010	-5	810	990		6 EW	620	9	-240	-260		11 EW	100	2	-40	40
2 EW	430	6	-210	50		7 EW	100	-2	-160	180		12 EW	-90	-3	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-2	60	30		8 EW	-420	0	430	440		13 EW	680	-5	-870	-630
4 EW	140	-7	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	150	-2	-210	-50
5 EW	100	12	610	490		10 EW	-650	-2	590	540
Net Imps 1

______________________________________________________________________

35 DARRYL COUZNER & BILL LOCKWOOD

Round 5

vs 13 DAVID MCLEISH & DAVID SMYTH

NS 17		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	1010	5	810	990		6 NS	-650	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	-50	0	-40	40
2 NS	-140	2	-210	50		7 NS	100	6	-160	180		12 NS	50	2	0	-60
3 NS	170	3	60	30		8 NS	430	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	5	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-5	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	200	9	-210	-50
5 NS	600	0	610	490		10 NS	200	-9	590	540
Net Imps 9

______________________________________________________________________

36 DIANA MCKENZIE & JIM VERVER

Round 5

vs 37 ROSEMARY WHITE & BEV WISHART

NS 16		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	480	-8	810	990		6 NS	-620	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	400	10	-40	40
2 NS	50	6	-210	50		7 NS	-110	2	-160	180		12 NS	-140	-4	0	-60
3 NS	-100	-4	60	30		8 NS	420	0	430	440		13 NS	140	14	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-5	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-150	2	-210	-50
5 NS	660	2	610	490		10 NS	200	-9	590	540
Net Imps -3

______________________________________________________________________

37 ROSEMARY WHITE & BEV WISHART

Round 5

vs 36 DIANA MCKENZIE & JIM VERVER

NS 16		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-480	8	810	990		6 EW	620	9	-240	-260		11 EW	-400	-10	-40	40
2 EW	-50	-6	-210	50		7 EW	110	-2	-160	180		12 EW	140	4	0	-60
3 EW	100	4	60	30		8 EW	-420	0	430	440		13 EW	-140	-14	-870	-630
4 EW	630	5	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	150	-2	-210	-50
5 EW	-660	-2	610	490		10 EW	-200	9	590	540
Net Imps 3

______________________________________________________________________

38 JUDITH MACKLOW & SUE WELBOURN

Round 5

vs 25 MARIE MCMAHON & PETER WILLIAMS

NS 19		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	50	13	810	990		6 EW	-400	-12	-240	-260		11 EW	-550	-11	-40	40
2 EW	130	-2	-210	50		7 EW	-100	-6	-160	180		12 EW	-90	-3	0	-60
3 EW	-170	-3	60	30		8 EW	-400	1	430	440		13 EW	500	-9	-870	-630
4 EW	150	-7	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	0	470	610		14 EW	-150	-8	-210	-50
5 EW	-750	-4	610	490		10 EW	-620	-1	590	540
Net Imps -52

______________________________________________________________________

39 SUE LUSK & THERESE TULLY

Round 5

vs 59 KIM FRAZER & TANIA GARIEPY

NS 22		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-980	0	810	990		6 EW	650	9	-240	-260		11 EW	-100	-2	-40	40
2 EW	-100	-2	-210	50		7 EW	-100	2	-160	180		12 EW	140	2	0	-60
3 EW	170	5	60	30		8 EW	-420	1	430	440		13 EW	1430	13	-870	-630
4 EW	630	4	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	4	470	610		14 EW	50	0	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	-3	610	490		10 EW	-620	-2	590	540
Net Imps 31

______________________________________________________________________

40 SUE WEAL & KATHRYN YULE

Round 5

vs 43 ELIZABETH HAVAS & MARLENE WATTS

NS 24		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	1010	1	810	990		6 NS	100	8	-240	-260		11 NS	100	2	-40	40
2 NS	50	0	-210	50		7 NS	200	1	-160	180		12 NS	-200	-4	0	-60
3 NS	200	5	60	30		8 NS	450	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	-2	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-4	-430	-500		9 NS	480	-4	470	610		14 NS	200	6	-210	-50
5 NS	150	-8	610	490		10 NS	990	10	590	540
Net Imps 11

______________________________________________________________________

41 RENA KAPLAN & PAULA SCHROOR

Round 5

vs 44 BERENICE FOLKARD & HELEN LOWRY

NS 20		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	980	0	810	990		6 NS	-620	-8	-240	-260		11 NS	-50	-3	-40	40
2 NS	-130	-5	-210	50		7 NS	300	3	-160	180		12 NS	50	3	0	-60
3 NS	-100	-4	60	30		8 NS	450	0	430	440		13 NS	-100	11	-870	-630
4 NS	500	14	-430	-500		9 NS	480	-4	470	610		14 NS	-100	-2	-210	-50
5 NS	600	3	610	490		10 NS	650	3	590	540
Net Imps 11

______________________________________________________________________

42 SARA TISHLER & BARBARA TRAVIS

Round 5

vs 58 YVETTE BOLAFFI & JACKIE FRANCO

NS 25		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-1010	-1	810	990		6 EW	-400	-12	-240	-260		11 EW	-50	0	-40	40
2 EW	-50	0	-210	50		7 EW	-200	-1	-160	180		12 EW	400	8	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-3	60	30		8 EW	-420	1	430	440		13 EW	680	2	-870	-630
4 EW	140	-8	-430	-500		9 EW	-980	-9	470	610		14 EW	150	3	-210	-50
5 EW	100	11	610	490		10 EW	400	14	590	540
Net Imps 5

______________________________________________________________________

43 ELIZABETH HAVAS & MARLENE WATTS

Round 5

vs 40 SUE WEAL & KATHRYN YULE

NS 24		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-1010	-1	810	990		6 EW	-100	-8	-240	-260		11 EW	-100	-2	-40	40
2 EW	-50	0	-210	50		7 EW	-200	-1	-160	180		12 EW	200	4	0	-60
3 EW	-200	-5	60	30		8 EW	-450	0	430	440		13 EW	680	2	-870	-630
4 EW	630	4	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	4	470	610		14 EW	-200	-6	-210	-50
5 EW	-150	8	610	490		10 EW	-990	-10	590	540
Net Imps -11

______________________________________________________________________

44 BERENICE FOLKARD & HELEN LOWRY

Round 5

vs 41 RENA KAPLAN & PAULA SCHROOR

NS 20		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-980	0	810	990		6 EW	620	8	-240	-260		11 EW	50	3	-40	40
2 EW	130	5	-210	50		7 EW	-300	-3	-160	180		12 EW	-50	-3	0	-60
3 EW	100	4	60	30		8 EW	-450	0	430	440		13 EW	100	-11	-870	-630
4 EW	-500	-14	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	4	470	610		14 EW	100	2	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	-3	610	490		10 EW	-650	-3	590	540
Net Imps -11

______________________________________________________________________

45 CAROL CURREY & PAULA MCLEISH

Round 5

vs 55 DENISE BUTTROSE & CARMEL THOMPSON

NS 23		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-520	10	810	990		6 EW	-100	-8	-240	-260		11 EW	50	3	-40	40
2 EW	-50	0	-210	50		7 EW	-200	-1	-160	180		12 EW	-50	-3	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-3	60	30		8 EW	-420	1	430	440		13 EW	500	-4	-870	-630
4 EW	600	3	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	4	470	610		14 EW	-110	-4	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	-3	610	490		10 EW	-650	-3	590	540
Net Imps -8

______________________________________________________________________

46 ALISON FALLON & BARBARA MARRETT

Round 5

vs 54 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

NS 21		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	980	0	810	990		6 NS	-620	-8	-240	-260		11 NS	50	0	-40	40
2 NS	50	0	-210	50		7 NS	-500	-12	-160	180		12 NS	50	3	0	-60
3 NS	-50	-2	60	30		8 NS	450	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	-2	-870	-630
4 NS	-660	-4	-430	-500		9 NS	980	9	470	610		14 NS	-400	-8	-210	-50
5 NS	600	3	610	490		10 NS	230	-7	590	540
Net Imps -28

______________________________________________________________________

47 SUSAN EMERSON & YADI PARROTT

Round 5

vs 57 YVONNE DENNIS & SANDY LEACH

NS 30		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	980	0	810	990		6 NS	200	10	-240	-260		11 NS	50	0	-40	40
2 NS	-130	-5	-210	50		7 NS	200	1	-160	180		12 NS	-140	-2	0	-60
3 NS	140	3	60	30		8 NS	450	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	-2	-870	-630
4 NS	-600	-3	-430	-500		9 NS	1700	14	470	610		14 NS	100	4	-210	-50
5 NS	620	4	610	490		10 NS	620	2	590	540
Net Imps 26

______________________________________________________________________

48 EVA CAPLAN & JENNY THOMPSON

Round 5

vs 50 HEATHER MOTTERAM & PRUDIE WAGNER

NS 29		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-980	0	810	990		6 EW	650	9	-240	-260		11 EW	-130	-3	-40	40
2 EW	-50	0	-210	50		7 EW	100	7	-160	180		12 EW	140	2	0	-60
3 EW	-170	-4	60	30		8 EW	50	10	430	440		13 EW	680	2	-870	-630
4 EW	630	4	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	4	470	610		14 EW	140	3	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	-3	610	490		10 EW	-80	10	590	540
Net Imps 41

______________________________________________________________________

49 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

Round 5

vs 52 ROSEMARY GRUND & ANNE HARRIS

NS 28		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-1020	-1	810	990		6 EW	-300	-11	-240	-260		11 EW	100	4	-40	40
2 EW	400	10	-210	50		7 EW	200	9	-160	180		12 EW	140	2	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-3	60	30		8 EW	-450	0	430	440		13 EW	680	2	-870	-630
4 EW	630	4	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	4	470	610		14 EW	150	3	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	-3	610	490		10 EW	-650	-3	590	540
Net Imps 17

______________________________________________________________________

50 HEATHER MOTTERAM & PRUDIE WAGNER

Round 5

vs 48 EVA CAPLAN & JENNY THOMPSON

NS 29		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	980	0	810	990		6 NS	-650	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	130	3	-40	40
2 NS	50	0	-210	50		7 NS	-100	-7	-160	180		12 NS	-140	-2	0	-60
3 NS	170	4	60	30		8 NS	-50	-10	430	440		13 NS	-680	-2	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-4	-430	-500		9 NS	480	-4	470	610		14 NS	-140	-3	-210	-50
5 NS	600	3	610	490		10 NS	80	-10	590	540
Net Imps -41

______________________________________________________________________

51 WENDY ANDREWS & JUDITH ROBERTS

Round 5

vs 56 DENISE KEENAN & ANN MELLINGS

NS 26		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	520	-10	810	990		6 NS	-620	-8	-240	-260		11 NS	130	3	-40	40
2 NS	-400	-10	-210	50		7 NS	200	1	-160	180		12 NS	-90	-1	0	-60
3 NS	170	4	60	30		8 NS	450	0	430	440		13 NS	-100	11	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-4	-430	-500		9 NS	480	-4	470	610		14 NS	50	3	-210	-50
5 NS	600	3	610	490		10 NS	680	4	590	540
Net Imps -8

______________________________________________________________________

52 ROSEMARY GRUND & ANNE HARRIS

Round 5

vs 49 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

NS 28		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	1020	1	810	990		6 NS	300	11	-240	-260		11 NS	-100	-4	-40	40
2 NS	-400	-10	-210	50		7 NS	-200	-9	-160	180		12 NS	-140	-2	0	-60
3 NS	140	3	60	30		8 NS	450	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	-2	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-4	-430	-500		9 NS	480	-4	470	610		14 NS	-150	-3	-210	-50
5 NS	600	3	610	490		10 NS	650	3	590	540
Net Imps -17

______________________________________________________________________

53 DEB BENNETT & PAM MORGAN-KING

Round 5

vs 60 JAN CLYNE & MARGARET YUILL

NS 27		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-1510	-11	810	990		6 EW	620	8	-240	-260		11 EW	140	5	-40	40
2 EW	-50	0	-210	50		7 EW	-200	-1	-160	180		12 EW	140	2	0	-60
3 EW	-170	-4	60	30		8 EW	-450	0	430	440		13 EW	680	2	-870	-630
4 EW	630	4	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	4	470	610		14 EW	150	3	-210	-50
5 EW	100	11	610	490		10 EW	-680	-4	590	540
Net Imps 19

______________________________________________________________________

54 LINDA KING & KIM NEALE

Round 5

vs 46 ALISON FALLON & BARBARA MARRETT

NS 21		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-980	0	810	990		6 EW	620	8	-240	-260		11 EW	-50	0	-40	40
2 EW	-50	0	-210	50		7 EW	500	12	-160	180		12 EW	-50	-3	0	-60
3 EW	50	2	60	30		8 EW	-450	0	430	440		13 EW	680	2	-870	-630
4 EW	660	4	-430	-500		9 EW	-980	-9	470	610		14 EW	400	8	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	-3	610	490		10 EW	-230	7	590	540
Net Imps 28

______________________________________________________________________

55 DENISE BUTTROSE & CARMEL THOMPSON

Round 5

vs 45 CAROL CURREY & PAULA MCLEISH

NS 23		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	520	-10	810	990		6 NS	100	8	-240	-260		11 NS	-50	-3	-40	40
2 NS	50	0	-210	50		7 NS	200	1	-160	180		12 NS	50	3	0	-60
3 NS	140	3	60	30		8 NS	420	-1	430	440		13 NS	-500	4	-870	-630
4 NS	-600	-3	-430	-500		9 NS	480	-4	470	610		14 NS	110	4	-210	-50
5 NS	600	3	610	490		10 NS	650	3	590	540
Net Imps 8

______________________________________________________________________

56 DENISE KEENAN & ANN MELLINGS

Round 5

vs 51 WENDY ANDREWS & JUDITH ROBERTS

NS 26		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-520	10	810	990		6 EW	620	8	-240	-260		11 EW	-130	-3	-40	40
2 EW	400	10	-210	50		7 EW	-200	-1	-160	180		12 EW	90	1	0	-60
3 EW	-170	-4	60	30		8 EW	-450	0	430	440		13 EW	100	-11	-870	-630
4 EW	630	4	-430	-500		9 EW	-480	4	470	610		14 EW	-50	-3	-210	-50
5 EW	-600	-3	610	490		10 EW	-680	-4	590	540
Net Imps 8

______________________________________________________________________

57 YVONNE DENNIS & SANDY LEACH

Round 5

vs 47 SUSAN EMERSON & YADI PARROTT

NS 30		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 EW	-980	0	810	990		6 EW	-200	-10	-240	-260		11 EW	-50	0	-40	40
2 EW	130	5	-210	50		7 EW	-200	-1	-160	180		12 EW	140	2	0	-60
3 EW	-140	-3	60	30		8 EW	-450	0	430	440		13 EW	680	2	-870	-630
4 EW	600	3	-430	-500		9 EW	-1700	-14	470	610		14 EW	-100	-4	-210	-50
5 EW	-620	-4	610	490		10 EW	-620	-2	590	540
Net Imps -26

______________________________________________________________________

58 YVETTE BOLAFFI & JACKIE FRANCO

Round 5

vs 42 SARA TISHLER & BARBARA TRAVIS

NS 25		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	1010	1	810	990		6 NS	400	12	-240	-260		11 NS	50	0	-40	40
2 NS	50	0	-210	50		7 NS	200	1	-160	180		12 NS	-400	-8	0	-60
3 NS	140	3	60	30		8 NS	420	-1	430	440		13 NS	-680	-2	-870	-630
4 NS	-140	8	-430	-500		9 NS	980	9	470	610		14 NS	-150	-3	-210	-50
5 NS	-100	-11	610	490		10 NS	-400	-14	590	540
Net Imps -5

______________________________________________________________________

59 KIM FRAZER & TANIA GARIEPY

Round 5

vs 39 SUE LUSK & THERESE TULLY

NS 22		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	980	0	810	990		6 NS	-650	-9	-240	-260		11 NS	100	2	-40	40
2 NS	100	2	-210	50		7 NS	100	-2	-160	180		12 NS	-140	-2	0	-60
3 NS	-170	-5	60	30		8 NS	420	-1	430	440		13 NS	-1430	-13	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-4	-430	-500		9 NS	480	-4	470	610		14 NS	-50	0	-210	-50
5 NS	600	3	610	490		10 NS	620	2	590	540
Net Imps -31

______________________________________________________________________

60 JAN CLYNE & MARGARET YUILL

Round 5

vs 53 DEB BENNETT & PAM MORGAN-KING

NS 27		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	1510	11	810	990		6 NS	-620	-8	-240	-260		11 NS	-140	-5	-40	40
2 NS	50	0	-210	50		7 NS	200	1	-160	180		12 NS	-140	-2	0	-60
3 NS	170	4	60	30		8 NS	450	0	430	440		13 NS	-680	-2	-870	-630
4 NS	-630	-4	-430	-500		9 NS	480	-4	470	610		14 NS	-150	-3	-210	-50
5 NS	-100	-11	610	490		10 NS	680	4	590	540
Net Imps -19

______________________________________________________________________

62 COLIN NORTON & PHAIK YAO

Round 5

vs 32 VAL CHURCHILL & GENE EFINGER

NS 13		2009 ANOT SENIORS PAIRS
BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG		BRD	SCORE	IMPS	SEN AVG	WOM AVG
1 NS	990	5	810	990		6 NS	300	11	-240	-260		11 NS	130	5	-40	40
2 NS	-90	3	-210	50		7 NS	-110	2	-160	180		12 NS	90	3	0	-60
3 NS	140	2	60	30		8 NS	450	1	430	440		13 NS	-650	6	-870	-630
4 NS	-110	8	-430	-500		9 NS	480	0	470	610		14 NS	-400	-5	-210	-50
5 NS	660	2	610	490		10 NS	650	2	590	540
Net Imps 45

______________________________________________________________________